Y.K. SOLOMAN vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G.,TUSHAR DHAR DIWAN — WPS/8456/2022

Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Hearing Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010367932022

Filing Number

WPS/20061/2022

Filing Date

10-Nov-2022

Registration No

WPS/8456/2022

Registration Date

25-Nov-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Y.K. SOLOMAN

    Adv. SHAKTI RAJ SINHA,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha, ,Nishi Kant Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,A.G.,TUSHAR DHAR DIWAN

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Deputy Inspector General

  4. 4.Office of Police General

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    In WPS No. 8456 of 2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner Y.K. Soloman four weeks' time to file a rejoinder to the respondents' counter-affidavits. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the expiry of the granted period to allow the petitioner to complete the necessary pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 19-Dec-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  5. 05-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  6. 30-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/8456/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In WPS No. 8456 of 2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner Y.K. Soloman four weeks' time to file a rejoinder to the respondents' counter-affidavits. The matter was adjourned for hearing after the expiry of the granted period to allow the petitioner to complete the necessary pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case