SUKHNANDAN DAS JANGDE vs MR. KOMAL SINGH THAKUR Advocate - A.G. — CONT/1272/2024
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010365742024
Filing Number
CONT/20976/2024
Filing Date
16-Oct-2024
Registration No
CONT/1272/2024
Registration Date
05-Nov-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )
Sub-Category
OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKHNANDAN DAS JANGDE
Adv. Deepali Gupta,DIWESH KUMAR,DIWESH KUMAR, ,DIWESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. KOMAL SINGH THAKUR Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Rajesh Nishad
-
3.Mr. Ranbir Sharma
-
4.Mr. Parmanand Banjare
-
5.Mr. Ghanshayam Singh Tanwar
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Summary: The petition (CONT No. 1272 of 2024) was initially dismissed for want of prosecution on 14/11/2024 when the petitioner failed to appear. However, subsequent orders show the case was reinstated with the petitioner represented by counsel. As of the latest order dated 13/04/2026, notice has been issued to respondents with a 3-week returnable period, and the matter is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
14-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
-
14-Nov-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
-
16-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CONT/1272/2024
Summary: The petition (CONT No. 1272 of 2024) was initially dismissed for want of prosecution on 14/11/2024 when the petitioner failed to appear. However, subsequent orders show the case was reinstated with the petitioner represented by counsel. As of the latest order dated 13/04/2026, notice has been issued to respondents with a 3-week returnable period, and the matter is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts