AKASH SAHU vs SMT. CHETNA SAHU Advocate - VIVEK KUMAR AGRAWAL, ,BHARTI KHUNTE,Shankar Lal Agrawal — FA(MAT)/290/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010361912025

Filing Number

FA(MAT)/22551/2025

Filing Date

18-Aug-2025

Registration No

FA(MAT)/290/2025

Registration Date

20-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY LAW MATTERS ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHER DIVORCE MATTERS. ( 1502 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH SAHU

    Adv. Prasoon Agrawal,SWEKSHA SHARMA,SWEKSHA SHARMA, ,Aditi Singhvi,SWEKSHA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. CHETNA SAHU Advocate - VIVEK KUMAR AGRAWAL, ,BHARTI KHUNTE,Shankar Lal Agrawal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: In FA(MAT) No. 290 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case between Akash Sahu and Smt. Chetna Sahu was adjourned. The Division Bench granted four weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to remove the procedural defaults pointed out by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  4. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  5. 22-Aug-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  6. 18-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA(MAT)/290/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In FA(MAT) No. 290 of 2025 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case between Akash Sahu and Smt. Chetna Sahu was adjourned. The Division Bench granted four weeks' time to the appellant's counsel to remove the procedural defaults pointed out by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case