SURATO BAI RATHIYA vs FARUK ANSARI — MAC/1936/2019

Disposed: --PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010353562019

Filing Number

MAC/21154/2019

Filing Date

14-Oct-2019

Registration No

MAC/1936/2019

Registration Date

08-Nov-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURATO BAI RATHIYA

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL,Hemant Kumar Patel,Hemant Kumar Patel, ,SANJEEV KUMAR SAHU,Hemant Kumar Patel

  2. 2.Sushila Rathiya

  3. 3.Jai Ram Rathiya (Minor)

  4. 4.Aanand Ran Rathiya (Minor)

  5. 5.Shobha Ram Rathiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FARUK ANSARI

  2. 2.Arun Gupta

    Adv. ISHWAR JAISWAL,AKHTAR HUSSAIN ABHISHEK SARAF

  3. 3.New Indian Insurance Com. Ltd

    Adv. DASHRATH GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal seeking exoneration from liability, finding that the company failed to plead or prove that the driver lacked a valid license for heavy vehicles in its written statement, making the belated application for additional evidence inadmissible under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. The court partly allowed the claimants' appeal, enhancing the motor accident compensation from Rs. 26,57,455 to Rs. 34,33,698 by adding 30% future prospects to the deceased forest guard's annual income as per Supreme Court precedent, with the additional amount carrying 9% interest from the claim filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 16-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  7. 28-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  8. 28-Nov-2019

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  9. 14-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  10. 14-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 14-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1936/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal seeking exoneration from liability, finding that the company failed to plead or prove that the driver lacked a valid license for heavy vehicles in its written statement, making the belated application for additional evidence inadmissible under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. The court partly allowed the claimants' appeal, enhancing the motor accident compensation from Rs. 26,57,455 to Rs. 34,33,698 by adding 30% future prospects to the deceased forest guard's annual income as per Supreme Court precedent, with the additional amount carrying 9% interest from the claim filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case