THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, vs SMT. POORNIMA Advocate - SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA, ,Sharad Mishra,PRIYA KAIWART,PRIYA KAIWART,PRASHANT SAHU — MAC/1950/2024
Status: For Orders [On Office Notes]. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
CNR: CGHC010348612024
Filing Number
MAC/19977/2024
Filing Date
03-Oct-2024
Registration No
MAC/1950/2024
Registration Date
14-Oct-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
Adv. DASHRATH GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. POORNIMA Advocate - SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA, ,Sharad Mishra,PRIYA KAIWART,PRIYA KAIWART,PRASHANT SAHU
-
2.Sonu
-
3.Minor Monu
-
4.Dhirsai
-
5.Deepak Singh Rajput
-
6.M/S Sarvmangala Construction Company Korba,
Adv. SHYAMAL MALLICK,Shubham Dev Mallick SAKET PANDEY
Case History
-
23-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Summary: In MAC No. 1950 of 2024 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, the case between The New India Assurance Company Limited and Smt. Poornima was adjourned for two weeks. The court noted that respondent No. 5 has expired and directed the office to verify that the default pointed out by the Registry has been cured, enabling the appellant's counsel to file an appropriate application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
-
16-Oct-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
03-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1950/2024
Summary: In MAC No. 1950 of 2024 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, the case between The New India Assurance Company Limited and Smt. Poornima was adjourned for two weeks. The court noted that respondent No. 5 has expired and directed the office to verify that the default pointed out by the Registry has been cured, enabling the appellant's counsel to file an appropriate application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts