MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/7783/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010346882022

Filing Number

WPS/18856/2022

Filing Date

21-Oct-2022

Registration No

WPS/7783/2022

Registration Date

09-Nov-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SUSPENSION. ( 604 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

    Adv. KISHORE NARAYAN,Deepali Gupta,Deepali Gupta, ,RAJNI SOREN,AMARNATH PANDEY,DIWESH KUMAR,Pritam Singh,Deepali Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/7783/2022 Mithilesh Kumar Pandey, an Assistant Grade-II clerk, challenged his suspension order dated 24.09.2022 issued by the Water Resource Department. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without setting aside the suspension, instead directing respondent authorities to expeditiously conclude the pending departmental inquiry against the petitioner preferably within 6 months, noting that the petitioner had attained superannuation age during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 11-Nov-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 21-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/7783/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/7783/2022 Mithilesh Kumar Pandey, an Assistant Grade-II clerk, challenged his suspension order dated 24.09.2022 issued by the Water Resource Department. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition without setting aside the suspension, instead directing respondent authorities to expeditiously conclude the pending departmental inquiry against the petitioner preferably within 6 months, noting that the petitioner had attained superannuation age during the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case