Surgeon Commander Syam N @ Syam Naveen Kumar vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPS/9714/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010342952025

Filing Number

WPS/21423/2025

Filing Date

05-Aug-2025

Registration No

WPS/9714/2025

Registration Date

18-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surgeon Commander Syam N @ Syam Naveen Kumar

    Adv. KUNAL DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.The Chief of the Naval Staff

  3. 3.The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Navy)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Surgeon Commander Syam N, who challenged a Medical Board's 13% disability assessment following service injuries. The court found that an internal appellate remedy (appeal to the Appellate Committee on First Appeal) was available but not exhausted, and therefore declined to entertain the petition. However, the court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within 3 weeks, with directions that the appellate authority decide it on merits within 4 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 20-Aug-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 05-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/9714/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by Surgeon Commander Syam N, who challenged a Medical Board's 13% disability assessment following service injuries. The court found that an internal appellate remedy (appeal to the Appellate Committee on First Appeal) was available but not exhausted, and therefore declined to entertain the petition. However, the court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within 3 weeks, with directions that the appellate authority decide it on merits within 4 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case