KALESHWAR PRASAD SAHU vs SMT. BISAHIN BAI BHARTI Advocate - Shobhit Mishra, ,Suyash Shukla,Navin Shukla — MAC/1755/2023
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010337852023
Filing Number
MAC/19590/2023
Filing Date
04-Oct-2023
Registration No
MAC/1755/2023
Registration Date
18-Oct-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
DRIVER / OWNERS LIABILITY MATTERS. ( 1203 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALESHWAR PRASAD SAHU
Adv. RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,DEVERSHI THAKUR,DEVERSHI THAKUR, ,SAUMYA SHARMA,SAUMYA SHARMA,DEVERSHI THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. BISAHIN BAI BHARTI Advocate - Shobhit Mishra, ,Suyash Shukla,Navin Shukla
-
2.Chetan Bharti
-
3.Mahesh Bharti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal (MAC No. 1755 of 2023) in a motor accident compensation case between Kaleshwar Prasad Sahu and Smt. Bisahin Bai Bharti after the parties reached an amicable settlement outside court. The appellant's withdrawal of the appeal was accepted by the court as unopposed by the respondents, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
-
04-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1755/2023
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal (MAC No. 1755 of 2023) in a motor accident compensation case between Kaleshwar Prasad Sahu and Smt. Bisahin Bai Bharti after the parties reached an amicable settlement outside court. The appellant's withdrawal of the appeal was accepted by the court as unopposed by the respondents, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts