SMT. MADHURI BAI SANNADYA vs MONCHU @ HEMANT — MAC/1875/2024

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010334252024

Filing Number

MAC/19085/2024

Filing Date

23-Sep-2024

Registration No

MAC/1875/2024

Registration Date

25-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MADHURI BAI SANNADYA

    Adv. AMAN KUMAR KESHARWANI,KRISHNA TANDON,KRISHNA TANDON, ,VARUN SHARMA,KRISHNA TANDON

  2. 2.Ku. Akshani Sannadya

  3. 3.Dilip Kumar Sannadya

  4. 4.Smt. Pacho Bai

  5. 5.Ajeet Kumar Sannadya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MONCHU @ HEMANT

  2. 2.Smt. Gulab Bai Gendle

  3. 3.The New Indian Insurance Company Ltd.

  4. 4.Branch Manager

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Case Summary: MAC 1875/2024 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the matter on 07/05/2026. Notice to respondent no.2 (owner) was returned unserved; the court ordered fresh notice via registered and speed post. Appellants appeared without counsel while respondents 1, 3 & 4 failed to appear despite service. The case is listed for hearing after 8 weeks, with process fee (P.F.) to be paid within 7 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 28-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 27-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  6. 27-Sep-2024

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  7. 23-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1875/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MAC 1875/2024 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the matter on 07/05/2026. Notice to respondent no.2 (owner) was returned unserved; the court ordered fresh notice via registered and speed post. Appellants appeared without counsel while respondents 1, 3 & 4 failed to appear despite service. The case is listed for hearing after 8 weeks, with process fee (P.F.) to be paid within 7 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case