STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs VIVEK KUMAR GHRITLAHRE — ACQA/399/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010324452018

Filing Number

ACQA/15657/2018

Filing Date

05-Oct-2018

Registration No

ACQA/399/2018

Registration Date

09-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. SATISH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK KUMAR GHRITLAHRE

    Adv. ,A.D.KULDEEP 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Vivek Kumar Ghritlahre in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that prosecution witnesses were either hearsay or did not support the case, and there was no reliable evidence establishing rash or negligent driving by the accused. The trial court's acquittal was upheld as a legally plausible view, in line with Supreme Court principles favoring accused persons when two interpretations of evidence are possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  5. 05-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/399/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Vivek Kumar Ghritlahre in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that prosecution witnesses were either hearsay or did not support the case, and there was no reliable evidence establishing rash or negligent driving by the accused. The trial court's acquittal was upheld as a legally plausible view, in line with Supreme Court principles favoring accused persons when two interpretations of evidence are possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case