BUDHANI BAI vs DHANI RAM Advocate - A.G. — SA/585/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010323032018

Filing Number

SA/18877/2018

Filing Date

04-Oct-2018

Registration No

SA/585/2018

Registration Date

06-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION ( 1717 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUDHANI BAI

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GULATI,Amrita Sharma,Amrita Sharma, ,Ravindra Sharma,Amrita Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHANI RAM Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chandan,

  3. 3.State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: SA/585/2018 - Budhani Bai v. Dhani Ram Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Budhani Bai's second appeal, upholding concurrent findings by the trial and appellate courts that she failed to establish her claim to the disputed land. The court ruled that Budhani Bai was not the legal heir of late Gurudayal Gond (the original owner), as she produced no documentary evidence (birth certificate, school records, etc.) to prove lineage, and contradicted herself during cross-examination by admitting her actual father was Kauwa Gond. The court found the 1983 sale deed executed by Dashmet Bai to defendant Dhani Ram was valid and properly registered, rejecting allegations of fraud and impersonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 09-Oct-2018

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

  5. 04-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/585/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/585/2018 - Budhani Bai v. Dhani Ram Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Budhani Bai's second appeal, upholding concurrent findings by the trial and appellate courts that she failed to establish her claim to the disputed land. The court ruled that Budhani Bai was not the legal heir of late Gurudayal Gond (the original owner), as she produced no documentary evidence (birth certificate, school records, etc.) to prove lineage, and contradicted herself during cross-examination by admitting her actual father was Kauwa Gond. The court found the 1983 sale deed executed by Dashmet Bai to defendant Dhani Ram was valid and properly registered, rejecting allegations of fraud and impersonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case