MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA vs LEELA BAI KOTHARI — FA/123/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010320802021

Filing Number

FA/17039/2021

Filing Date

26-Nov-2021

Registration No

FA/123/2021

Registration Date

13-Dec-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT. ( 1702 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA

    Adv. M.L.SAKAT,CHAKRESH TIWARI,CHAKRESH TIWARI, ,Trishna Das,B.P.SHARMA,Anmol Sharma,ANUJA SHARMA,SAMEEKSHA GUPTA,RAZA ALI,CHAKRESH TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEELA BAI KOTHARI

  2. 2.Gautam Chad ltiari,

    Adv. Siddharth Shukla,SAMRIDDHI SHUKLA

  3. 3.Smt. Kiran Lodha,

  4. 4.Smt. Manju Sethia,

  5. 5.Smt. Suraj Jhabak,

  6. 6.Smt. Tara Kotadia,

  7. 7.Smt. Poonam Shukla

    Adv. RATNESH KUMAR AGRAWAL,SOURAV AGRAWAL

  8. 8.Kumari Deepti Shukla

  9. 9.Kumari Richa Shukla

  10. 10.Kumari Dipika Shukla

  11. 11.Guruprasad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the appellant Manoj Kumar Shukla's application for leave to appeal against a specific performance decree, holding that as a non-party to the original sale agreement, he is not an "aggrieved person" despite being a co-owner of the shop. The court reasoned that adding a co-owner claiming adverse interest would convert the suit from specific performance into a title suit, which is impermissible under the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 09-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  5. 15-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  6. 26-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  7. 20-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  8. 07-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  10. 05-Jan-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri , Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  11. 15-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri,Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  12. 15-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 26-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/123/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the appellant Manoj Kumar Shukla's application for leave to appeal against a specific performance decree, holding that as a non-party to the original sale agreement, he is not an "aggrieved person" despite being a co-owner of the shop. The court reasoned that adding a co-owner claiming adverse interest would convert the suit from specific performance into a title suit, which is impermissible under the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case