SURAJPAL ALIAS SURUJ vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/1589/2025
Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010316522025
Filing Number
CRA/11970/2025
Filing Date
22-Jul-2025
Registration No
CRA/1589/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS RELATING TO DRUGS & COSMETICS, NDPS ACT. ( 1416 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJPAL ALIAS SURUJ
Adv. Lukesh Kumar Mishra,DURLABH KUMAR AGRAWAL,DURLABH KUMAR AGRAWAL, ,Vinay Nagdev,Faiz Kazi,GIRISH SAHU,AKASH MISHRA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,DURLABH KUMAR AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh upheld the appellant Surajpal's conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possessing 11.81 kg of ganja, but reduced his sentence from 7 years rigorous imprisonment to 1.5 years, considering his custodial period already served, lack of criminal antecedents, and rehabilitation principles. The fine of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the trial court was maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
03-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/1589/2025
The High Court of Chhattisgarh upheld the appellant Surajpal's conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possessing 11.81 kg of ganja, but reduced his sentence from 7 years rigorous imprisonment to 1.5 years, considering his custodial period already served, lack of criminal antecedents, and rehabilitation principles. The fine of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the trial court was maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts