CHANDRIKA PRASAD VERMA vs VINOD KUMAR DUBEY — CRMP/2285/2023

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010314042023

Filing Number

CRMP/13205/2023

Filing Date

14-Sep-2023

Registration No

CRMP/2285/2023

Registration Date

06-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. ( 1427 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRIKA PRASAD VERMA

    Adv. SOURABH SAHU,KAJAL CHANDRA,KAJAL CHANDRA, ,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,Somraj Shrivastava,ISHA JAJODIA,ANU MISHRA,ANU MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: In CRMP No. 2285/2023 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, petitioner Chandrika Prasad Verma's matter was called twice on 06/05/2026, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The court adjourned the matter without deciding the petition on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  7. 11-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  8. 09-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  9. 09-Oct-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  10. 14-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/2285/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CRMP No. 2285/2023 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, petitioner Chandrika Prasad Verma's matter was called twice on 06/05/2026, but no counsel appeared for the petitioner. The court adjourned the matter without deciding the petition on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case