SMT. SOURABH SINGH vs SARDAR HARAKBIR SINGH — MAC/1067/2022
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010310302022
Filing Number
MAC/16657/2022
Filing Date
23-Sep-2022
Registration No
MAC/1067/2022
Registration Date
30-Sep-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS. ( 1210 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SOURABH SINGH
Adv. Arpit Agrawal,SAMEER ORAON,SAMEER ORAON, ,RAHUL TAMASKAR,M.L.SAKAT,ANUJA SHARMA,ANMOL SHARMA,NITESH JAIN,NIKHIL PARAKH,SAMEEKSHA GUPTA,SAMEER ORAON
-
2.Master Viyan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARDAR HARAKBIR SINGH
-
2.Sardar Baljeet Singh
-
3.S.B.I. General Insurance
Adv. NILESH KUMAR THAKUR,shokie Yadav ROHITASHVA SINGH SHOURYABHINANDAN THAKUR HARSHMANDER RASTOGI
-
4.Shanti Devi
-
5.Brij Mohan Singh
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Case Status Summary: In MAC 1067/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh (07/05/2026) adjourned the case for hearing just after summer vacation. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and service of notice to respondents 1 & 2 remains pending. The case was listed for later consideration pending completion of service requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
Final Disposal/Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
09-Jan-2023
Fresh Matters ( Dormant Case )
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
11-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
11-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1067/2022
Case Status Summary: In MAC 1067/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh (07/05/2026) adjourned the case for hearing just after summer vacation. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and service of notice to respondents 1 & 2 remains pending. The case was listed for later consideration pending completion of service requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts