T. VISHNU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/6151/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010309482022

Filing Number

WPS/16618/2022

Filing Date

23-Sep-2022

Registration No

WPS/6151/2022

Registration Date

24-Sep-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SUSPENSION. ( 604 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.T. VISHNU

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Sahu,YATHARTH SINGH,YATHARTH SINGH, ,CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI,Achal Choubey,Achal Choubey,Achyut tiwari,Achyut tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.District Education Officer

  3. 3.Managing Director

  4. 4.Regional Director

  5. 5.Principal

  6. 6.Manager

  7. 7.Disciplinary authority

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by T. Vishnu, a Drawing and Painting Teacher at DAV Public School Gevra, on the ground that it had become infructuous by efflux of time. Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition no longer served any practical purpose and therefore dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 28-Sep-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 28-Sep-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  6. 23-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/6151/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by T. Vishnu, a Drawing and Painting Teacher at DAV Public School Gevra, on the ground that it had become infructuous by efflux of time. Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition no longer served any practical purpose and therefore dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case