LEKHRAM SAHU vs SMT. SEVATI KATAKWAR — ACQA/360/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2026.
CNR: CGHC010295532018
Filing Number
ACQA/14232/2018
Filing Date
13-Sep-2018
Registration No
ACQA/360/2018
Registration Date
14-Sep-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEKHRAM SAHU
Adv. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,S. Gupta,S. Gupta, ,Dashrath Kushwaha,Dashrath Kushwaha,Dashrath Kushwaha,Dashrath Kushwaha,Dashrath Kushwaha,Dashrath Kushwaha
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. SEVATI KATAKWAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the appellant/complainant to withdraw the acquittal appeal and granted liberty to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Judge within 60 days, holding that the complainant qualifies as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) of the CrPC based on Supreme Court precedent. The court clarified that limitation would not be a bar if the appeal is filed within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2022
Motion Hearing Matters ( Dormant Case )
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
-
04-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
04-Feb-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna SharmaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2019
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
-
26-Nov-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna SharmaView PDF
-
26-Nov-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. ACQA/360/2018
The High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the appellant/complainant to withdraw the acquittal appeal and granted liberty to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Judge within 60 days, holding that the complainant qualifies as a "victim" under Section 2(wa) of the CrPC based on Supreme Court precedent. The court clarified that limitation would not be a bar if the appeal is filed within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts