SMT. UMA PATEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/272/2021
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010294632020
Filing Number
WPC/14764/2020
Filing Date
17-Dec-2020
Registration No
WPC/272/2021
Registration Date
18-Jan-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. UMA PATEL
Adv. DEEPALI PANDEY,ATUL PANDEY,ATUL PANDEY, ,BINU SHARMA,ATUL PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Tahsildar
-
3.Panna Lal Suryavanshi
-
4.Geeta Prasad Suryavanshi
-
5.Smt. Kanti Bai Tengwar
-
6.Janki Bai Suryavanshi
-
7.Vinay Kumar Gadvaliya
-
8.Vinod Kumar
-
9.Santosh Kumar
-
10.Sanjay Kumar
-
11.Laxmin Bai
-
12.Mahima
-
13.Latel Suryavanshi
-
14.Naveen Suryavasnhi
-
15.Chandrika Suryavanshi
-
16.Amrika Bai
-
17.Anjana
-
18.Satish Suryavanshi
-
19.Ashok Suryavanshi
-
20.Shakul Bai
-
21.Mongra Bai
-
22.Pushplata Parihar
-
23.Annu Kumar
-
24.Lavina Bai
-
25.Arvind Khare
-
26.Chitgovind
-
27.Rajesh Bajpai
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: In WPC No. 272/2021, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted petitioner Smt. Uma Patel's request for two weeks' time to cure procedural defaults identified by the Registry. The matter was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel to rectify the deficiencies before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Feb-2021
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
-
27-Jan-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
27-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/272/2021
Case Summary: In WPC No. 272/2021, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted petitioner Smt. Uma Patel's request for two weeks' time to cure procedural defaults identified by the Registry. The matter was adjourned to allow the petitioner's counsel to rectify the deficiencies before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts