SMT. PURNIMA SAHU vs BALMIKI SAHU Advocate - Samir Singh, ,ARVIND PRASAD — MAC/1696/2024

Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: CGHC010294212024

Filing Number

MAC/16679/2024

Filing Date

23-Aug-2024

Registration No

MAC/1696/2024

Registration Date

28-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS. ( 1210 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PURNIMA SAHU

    Adv. SUNIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,RAJENDRA PATEL, ,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.Divyanshu Sahu

  3. 3.Oshika Kumari

  4. 4.Ghanshyam Sahu

  5. 5.Smt. Triveni Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALMIKI SAHU Advocate - Samir Singh, ,ARVIND PRASAD

  2. 2.Branch Manager

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    The appeal (MAC No. 1696 of 2024) filed by Smt. Purnima Sahu versus Balmiki Sahu in the High Court of Chhattisgarh has been admitted for final hearing. However, as of the last order dated 06/05/2026, the case was adjourned due to absence of both parties despite repeated calls. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 28-Nov-2024

    Fresh Matters ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

  7. 30-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  8. 30-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1696/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The appeal (MAC No. 1696 of 2024) filed by Smt. Purnima Sahu versus Balmiki Sahu in the High Court of Chhattisgarh has been admitted for final hearing. However, as of the last order dated 06/05/2026, the case was adjourned due to absence of both parties despite repeated calls. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case