SMT. CHAMELI BAI vs SHAMSHER ALI — MAC/720/2021
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010292392021
Filing Number
MAC/15674/2021
Filing Date
28-Oct-2021
Registration No
MAC/720/2021
Registration Date
18-Nov-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. CHAMELI BAI
Adv. GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,Gaurav Singhal,Gaurav Singhal, ,AVINASH CHAND SAHU,SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL L,SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL L,Kapil Maini,Kapil Maini,Gaurav Singhal
-
2.Ramkumar Manikpuri
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAMSHER ALI
-
2.Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited,
Adv. SOURABH SHARMA,TARKESHWAR NANDE SHAILESH TIWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal filed by Chameli Bai and Ramkumar Manikpuri as withdrawn on 06.05.2026. The appellants' counsel informed the court that since their cross-objection against the insurance company's appeal had been allowed, the appeal had become infructuous and they sought permission to withdraw it, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
20-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
17-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF
-
19-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
23-Nov-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
23-Nov-2021
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
28-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/720/2021
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal filed by Chameli Bai and Ramkumar Manikpuri as withdrawn on 06.05.2026. The appellants' counsel informed the court that since their cross-objection against the insurance company's appeal had been allowed, the appeal had become infructuous and they sought permission to withdraw it, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts