M/S HARI OM PLASTIC vs State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G. — ARBA/38/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010291192025

e-Filing Number

30-06-2025

Filing Number

ARBA/17993/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

ARBA/38/2025

Registration Date

08-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ARBITRATION MATTERS ( 11 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS. ( 1103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S HARI OM PLASTIC

    Adv. KABEER KALWANI,MISS ANUSHKA SHARMA,MISS ANUSHKA SHARMA, ,MANOJ PARANJPE,Rishabh Gupta,Arpan Verma,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,SHASHWAT MISHRA,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Raipur Development Authority

    Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL,ANIMESH VERMA Ramayan Yadav SOUMYA RAI RAHUL AMBAST ASHUTOSH SHRIVASTAVA RAVI SINGH

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.Revenue Officer Tehsildar, Raipur Development Authority

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    ARBA/38/2025 Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed M/S Hari Om Plastic's appeal, condoning an 18-day delay in filing a Section 34 objection application against an arbitral award and remitting the case for fresh consideration on merits. The court held that the delay constituted "sufficient cause" under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the appellant had consulted advocates and the application was filed within the permissible 30-day extension period, and denying condonation would cause substantial injustice given the ₹24,38,000 forfeited deposit and prior dismissals in writ and arbitration proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 10-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  5. 10-Jul-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  6. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBA/38/2025

casestatus.in Summary

ARBA/38/2025 Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed M/S Hari Om Plastic's appeal, condoning an 18-day delay in filing a Section 34 objection application against an arbitral award and remitting the case for fresh consideration on merits. The court held that the delay constituted "sufficient cause" under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the appellant had consulted advocates and the application was filed within the permissible 30-day extension period, and denying condonation would cause substantial injustice given the ₹24,38,000 forfeited deposit and prior dismissals in writ and arbitration proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case