PRAVIN SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/1373/2025
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010290482025
Filing Number
CRA/11101/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
CRA/1373/2025
Registration Date
14-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT, KIDNAPPING & ABDUCTION. ( 1404 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVIN SAHU
Adv. VIVEK KUMAR AGRAWAL,GURPRIT KOUR BHATIA,GURPRIT KOUR BHATIA, ,Shubham Tripathi,INDIRA TRIPATHI,Vivek kumar tripathi,AWADH TRIPATHI,Shankar Lal Agrawal,M.P.S.BHATIA,M.P.S.BHATIA,M.P.S.BHATIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: CRA/1373/2025 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh acquitted Pravin Sahu, reversing his conviction under IPC Section 376(2)(n) (rape) and SC/ST (P.A.) Act Section 3(2)(v). The court found the relationship consensual between educated adults, with the victim's own admissions revealing she knew the accused was married yet continued contact for years without immediate complaint, negating forced intercourse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Aug-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/1373/2025
CASE SUMMARY: CRA/1373/2025 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh acquitted Pravin Sahu, reversing his conviction under IPC Section 376(2)(n) (rape) and SC/ST (P.A.) Act Section 3(2)(v). The court found the relationship consensual between educated adults, with the victim's own admissions revealing she knew the accused was married yet continued contact for years without immediate complaint, negating forced intercourse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts