STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs ABHIMANYU YADAV — ACQA/228/2021
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010287242021
Filing Number
ACQA/13335/2021
Filing Date
25-Oct-2021
Registration No
ACQA/228/2021
Registration Date
26-Oct-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 23-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABHIMANYU YADAV
Adv. ,HARISH KHUNTIYA,C. JAYANT K. RAO 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Abhimanyu Yadav in a narcotic drugs case. The court upheld the trial court's findings that the ganja was not recovered from the respondent's exclusive possession (recovered from a common verandah shared with family members) and that the prosecution failed to properly follow chain of custody procedures under Section 55 of the NDPS Act 1985, including unsealed sample packets and discrepancies regarding sample seals. The court found no infirmity in the acquittal judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
07-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
07-May-2025
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
25-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. ACQA/228/2021
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Abhimanyu Yadav in a narcotic drugs case. The court upheld the trial court's findings that the ganja was not recovered from the respondent's exclusive possession (recovered from a common verandah shared with family members) and that the prosecution failed to properly follow chain of custody procedures under Section 55 of the NDPS Act 1985, including unsealed sample packets and discrepancies regarding sample seals. The court found no infirmity in the acquittal judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts