STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs DEVNANDAN TIRKI Advocate - Pushkar Sinha, ,SHASHIKESH YADAV,PRASHANT KUMAR,PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA — ACQA/208/2020

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010286652020

Filing Number

ACQA/14341/2020

Filing Date

10-Dec-2020

Registration No

ACQA/208/2020

Registration Date

11-Dec-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVNANDAN TIRKI Advocate - Pushkar Sinha, ,SHASHIKESH YADAV,PRASHANT KUMAR,PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.Rajeev Khalko

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: ACQA/208/2020 The State of Chhattisgarh's appeal against Devnandan Tirki and another was admitted for hearing by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 16/04/2026. After considering statements of the prosecutrix (PW-5) and her nephew (PW-8), the court found the appeal arguable. The matter has been listed for final hearing; no notice needed as respondents already appeared through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  5. 10-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/208/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ACQA/208/2020 The State of Chhattisgarh's appeal against Devnandan Tirki and another was admitted for hearing by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 16/04/2026. After considering statements of the prosecutrix (PW-5) and her nephew (PW-8), the court found the appeal arguable. The matter has been listed for final hearing; no notice needed as respondents already appeared through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case