AMARDAS MATRE vs ARUN KUMAR Advocate - A.G., ,ANIL KUMAR GULATI,Samir Singh — CRR/1032/2019

Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: CGHC010286612019

Filing Number

CRR/11937/2019

Filing Date

22-Aug-2019

Registration No

CRR/1032/2019

Registration Date

23-Aug-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. ( 1427 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARDAS MATRE

    Adv. A.P.SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR Advocate - A.G., ,ANIL KUMAR GULATI,Samir Singh

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Amardas Matre, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. The court suspended the jail sentence on condition that the applicant deposit 30% of the fine (Rs. 60,000) within one month and furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, with the remaining 70% fine payment also suspended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Nov-2019

    Fresh Matters ( Sinedie Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  5. 28-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  6. 28-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/1032/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Amardas Matre, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. The court suspended the jail sentence on condition that the applicant deposit 30% of the fine (Rs. 60,000) within one month and furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, with the remaining 70% fine payment also suspended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case