SIMON EKKA vs SMT. VEENA Advocate - SANJAY AGRAWAL, ,SUDHIR SHARMA,SAMIKSHA BURMAN — FA(MAT)/286/2024

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010283602024

Filing Number

FA(MAT)/16073/2024

Filing Date

14-Aug-2024

Registration No

FA(MAT)/286/2024

Registration Date

23-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY LAW MATTERS ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHER DIVORCE MATTERS. ( 1502 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIMON EKKA

    Adv. SAJAL KUMAR GUPTA,DILHARAN YADAV,DILHARAN YADAV, ,Saurabh Dangi,Surya Kawalkar Dangi,Aditi Singhvi,AISHWARY PRASAD,PALAK DWIVEDI,DILHARAN SINGH YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. VEENA Advocate - SANJAY AGRAWAL, ,SUDHIR SHARMA,SAMIKSHA BURMAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: FA(MAT)/286/2024 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Simon Ekka's appeal against the Family Court's rejection of his divorce petition filed on grounds of cruelty under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The court found that Ekka failed to produce concrete evidence substantiating his allegations that his wife treated him with cruelty, including claims of taunting about alleged affairs, non-participation in family functions, and public humiliation. The High Court noted his allegations were vague and unsupported by specific instances, dates, or material evidence, and found his claim of desertion since 2019 unreliable given both parties' government service obligations requiring separate residences and his own admission they lived together during COVID and met as recently as August 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  11. 13-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  12. 15-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  13. 12-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  14. 08-Oct-2024

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  15. 28-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  16. 28-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 14-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA(MAT)/286/2024

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: FA(MAT)/286/2024 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Simon Ekka's appeal against the Family Court's rejection of his divorce petition filed on grounds of cruelty under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The court found that Ekka failed to produce concrete evidence substantiating his allegations that his wife treated him with cruelty, including claims of taunting about alleged affairs, non-participation in family functions, and public humiliation. The High Court noted his allegations were vague and unsupported by specific instances, dates, or material evidence, and found his claim of desertion since 2019 unreliable given both parties' government service obligations requiring separate residences and his own admission they lived together during COVID and met as recently as August 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case