State Of Chhattisgarh vs Ajay Munda @ Gurucharan Singh Munda — ACQA/42/2016

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-May-2016

CNR: CGHC010278472016

Filing Number

ACQA/10206/2016

Filing Date

30-Apr-2016

Registration No

ACQA/42/2016

Registration Date

02-May-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Munda @ Gurucharan Singh Munda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Ajay Munda for murder (Section 302 IPC). The court found that eye-witnesses (including the complainant uncle) failed to support their initial statements during trial, the alleged murder weapon had no blood traces per FSL report, and prosecution evidence was insufficient to establish the respondent's involvement in his brother Ram Prasad's death. The trial court's acquittal was upheld as legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  12. 29-Aug-2025

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  15. 28-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  16. 28-Apr-2025

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  17. 10-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  18. 06-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  19. 05-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 30-Apr-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/42/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of Ajay Munda for murder (Section 302 IPC). The court found that eye-witnesses (including the complainant uncle) failed to support their initial statements during trial, the alleged murder weapon had no blood traces per FSL report, and prosecution evidence was insufficient to establish the respondent's involvement in his brother Ram Prasad's death. The trial court's acquittal was upheld as legally sound. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case