STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs VIJAY KUMAR Advocate - GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,AVINASH CHAND SAHU,AVINASH CHAND SAHU — ACQA/615/2019

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010277992019

Filing Number

ACQA/11617/2019

Filing Date

16-Aug-2019

Registration No

ACQA/615/2019

Registration Date

19-Aug-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR Advocate - GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,AVINASH CHAND SAHU,AVINASH CHAND SAHU

  2. 2.Anand

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case (ACQA No. 615 of 2019, State vs. Vijay Kumar) after the respondent's counsel informed that Respondent No. 1 has passed away during the appeal's pendency. The State's counsel was directed to verify this fact and file an appropriate application if required, with the matter posted for further orders after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  4. 30-Sep-2019

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

  5. 26-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra,Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  6. 26-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/615/2019

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the case (ACQA No. 615 of 2019, State vs. Vijay Kumar) after the respondent's counsel informed that Respondent No. 1 has passed away during the appeal's pendency. The State's counsel was directed to verify this fact and file an appropriate application if required, with the matter posted for further orders after two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case