KISHAN KUMAR JAISWAL vs CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR BAJPAI, ,A.G.,Palash Tiwari — WPS/5734/2022
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010276542022
Filing Number
WPS/14869/2022
Filing Date
24-Aug-2022
Registration No
WPS/5734/2022
Registration Date
03-Sep-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KISHAN KUMAR JAISWAL
Adv. Ashutosh Shukla,Anamika Shukla,Anamika Shukla, ,B.K. SHUKLA,Anamika Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR BAJPAI, ,A.G.,Palash Tiwari
-
2.Area Manager
-
3.Personnel Manager (Rev)
-
4.The Collector
-
5.The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) - cum Acquisition Officer
-
6.The Tahsildar
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
In WPS No. 5734 of 2022 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case of Kishan Kumar Jaiswal versus Chief General Manager was adjourned. The matter has been called for hearing after two weeks from the order date of 10.4.2026, with counsel for respondents present and no representation for the petitioner on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
13-Sep-2022
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
08-Sep-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
08-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/5734/2022
In WPS No. 5734 of 2022 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, the case of Kishan Kumar Jaiswal versus Chief General Manager was adjourned. The matter has been called for hearing after two weeks from the order date of 10.4.2026, with counsel for respondents present and no representation for the petitioner on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts