SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs SMT. KAUSHALYA NAYAK — MAC/1456/2023
Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010275112023
Filing Number
MAC/15620/2023
Filing Date
21-Aug-2023
Registration No
MAC/1456/2023
Registration Date
23-Aug-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. SOURABH SHARMA,JAYPAL SINGH CHANDEL,JAYPAL SINGH CHANDEL, ,TARKESHWAR NANDE,SHAILESH TIWARI,CHITRAM SAHU,CHITRAM SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. KAUSHALYA NAYAK
-
2.Ku. Tamanna Nayak
-
3.Ku. Kritika Nayak
-
4.Smt. Nirmala Devi
-
5.Rajesh Kumar Nayak
-
6.Ashok Kumar Gandami
-
7.Smt. Koshy Gandami
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Case Summary: MAC/1456/2023 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Interim Application No. 02 of 2023 by making absolute the interim relief previously granted on 24.08.2023 until further order. The matter has been adjourned to July 2026 for final hearing, with Shriram General Insurance Company's counsel present and respondents absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
-
21-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1456/2023
Case Summary: MAC/1456/2023 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Interim Application No. 02 of 2023 by making absolute the interim relief previously granted on 24.08.2023 until further order. The matter has been adjourned to July 2026 for final hearing, with Shriram General Insurance Company's counsel present and respondents absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts