ABHISHEK KUMAR NIRMALKAR vs SIDDHARTH KOMAL PARDESHI — CONT/1097/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010271872025

Filing Number

CONT/16693/2025

Filing Date

28-Jun-2025

Registration No

CONT/1097/2025

Registration Date

17-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK KUMAR NIRMALKAR

    Adv. AJAY SHRIVASTAVA,G.P.MATHUR,G.P.MATHUR, ,VINOD KUMAR SHARMA,BARUN KUMAR CHAKRABARTY,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI,G.P.MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIDDHARTH KOMAL PARDESHI

  2. 2.Rituraj Raghuwanshi

  3. 3.Satyadev Verma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: CONT/1097/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed Abhishek Kumar Nirmalkar's contempt petition against education department officials (Secretary, Director of Public Instructions, and District Education Officer) after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying order had been complied with. The court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 21-Jul-2025

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 28-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/1097/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CONT/1097/2025 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed Abhishek Kumar Nirmalkar's contempt petition against education department officials (Secretary, Director of Public Instructions, and District Education Officer) after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying order had been complied with. The court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case