RAJKUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/3200/2020

Disposed: Contested--DISSMISS FOR DEFAULT/NON-PROSECUTION on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010270902020

Filing Number

WPC/13448/2020

Filing Date

24-Nov-2020

Registration No

WPC/3200/2020

Registration Date

09-Dec-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISSMISS FOR DEFAULT/NON-PROSECUTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR YADAV

    Adv. KAUSHAL YADAV,PURNENDRA KHICHARIYA,PURNENDRA KHICHARIYA, ,PURNENDRA KHICHARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest

  3. 3.The Divisional Forest Officer

  4. 4.Laxman Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC No. 3200 of 2020 filed by Rajkumar Yadav against the State of Chhattisgarh and forest officials for want of prosecution on 13 April 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation despite the matter being called twice for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 05-Jan-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF

  5. 05-Jan-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

  6. 24-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3200/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC No. 3200 of 2020 filed by Rajkumar Yadav against the State of Chhattisgarh and forest officials for want of prosecution on 13 April 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear or provide any representation despite the matter being called twice for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case