VENKAT MANIKRAM SHINDE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/2247/2024

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010270132024

Filing Number

CRMP/11752/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2024

Registration No

CRMP/2247/2024

Registration Date

16-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VENKAT MANIKRAM SHINDE

    Adv. PRASHANT DANSENA,DILHARAN YADAV,DILHARAN YADAV, ,HARI AGRAWAL,HARI AGRAWAL,HARI AGRAWAL

  2. 2.Shivaji Manikram Shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Station House Officer

  3. 3.Dinesh Agrawal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Venkat Manikram Shinde and Shivaji Manikram Shinde seeking quashing of the FIR against them. The court declined to interfere at this stage since investigation was completed and a charge sheet had been filed, with the case fixed for framing of charges. The petitioners were permitted to raise all objections before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  4. 21-Aug-2024

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  5. 05-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/2247/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petition filed by Venkat Manikram Shinde and Shivaji Manikram Shinde seeking quashing of the FIR against them. The court declined to interfere at this stage since investigation was completed and a charge sheet had been filed, with the case fixed for framing of charges. The petitioners were permitted to raise all objections before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case