NAND KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/7954/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010270112025

Filing Number

WPS/16574/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

WPS/7954/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAND KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. Arpan Verma,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL, ,Rishabh Gupta,SANDEEP PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.The District Education Officer

  4. 4.The Block Education Officer

  5. 5.Satyendra Prasad Parmar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/7954/2025 Nand Kumar Gupta, an Assistant Block Education Officer in Kusmi, filed this petition seeking protection from removal from his post. Both parties filed a compromise application stating the petitioner's grievance had been redressed. The Lok Adalat found the settlement terms just, proper, and legal, accepted the compromise, and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 17-Jul-2025

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/7954/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/7954/2025 Nand Kumar Gupta, an Assistant Block Education Officer in Kusmi, filed this petition seeking protection from removal from his post. Both parties filed a compromise application stating the petitioner's grievance had been redressed. The Lok Adalat found the settlement terms just, proper, and legal, accepted the compromise, and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case