VASUDEV MANJHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/6491/2025
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010261822025
Filing Number
WPS/16036/2025
Filing Date
24-Jun-2025
Registration No
WPS/6491/2025
Registration Date
25-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT. ( 613 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASUDEV MANJHI
Adv. SOMKANT VERMA,MANOJ CHAUHAN,MANOJ CHAUHAN, ,MANOJ CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Chief Engineer,
-
3.Chief Engineer,
-
4.Executive Engineer,
-
5.Sub-Divisional Officer,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 6491/2025 - Vasudev Manjhi v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Vasudev Manjhi's writ petition seeking compassionate appointment following his brother's death in service. The court set aside the authorities' demand for a succession certificate, finding no such requirement in the 2013 compassionate appointment policy. The court directed the petitioner to submit an affidavit from siblings confirming no objection to his appointment, after which authorities must finalize his claim within three months strictly per established guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
30-Jun-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
24-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/6491/2025
Case Summary: WPS 6491/2025 - Vasudev Manjhi v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Vasudev Manjhi's writ petition seeking compassionate appointment following his brother's death in service. The court set aside the authorities' demand for a succession certificate, finding no such requirement in the 2013 compassionate appointment policy. The court directed the petitioner to submit an affidavit from siblings confirming no objection to his appointment, after which authorities must finalize his claim within three months strictly per established guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts