KRISHNA KUMAR vs AJJU DAS — MAC/1516/2025
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010255032025
Filing Number
MAC/15556/2025
Filing Date
20-Jun-2025
Registration No
MAC/1516/2025
Registration Date
14-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNA KUMAR
Adv. PRIYA KAIWART,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR, ,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,Sharad Mishra,PRASHANT SAHU,KAUSTUBH SINGH THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJJU DAS
Adv. AMIT KUMAR,K. RADHIKA,JYOTI RATHORE 1123
-
2.The Oriantal Insurance Company Limited
Adv. DEEPAK GUPTA
-
3.The Oriantal Insurance Company Limited
-
4.Sukhnandan Prashad Sahu
Adv. CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI,Achyut tiwari SHYAM KUMAR
-
5.Yogesh Kumar Dubey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
In this motor accident compensation case, the National Lok Adalat of Chhattisgarh High Court approved a settlement between claimant Krishna Kumar and Oriental Insurance Company, whereby the insurer agreed to pay an additional Rs. 30,000 within two months. The matter was disposed of based on the compromise petition filed by both parties, with conditions imposed by the Claims Tribunal remaining intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
20-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1516/2025
In this motor accident compensation case, the National Lok Adalat of Chhattisgarh High Court approved a settlement between claimant Krishna Kumar and Oriental Insurance Company, whereby the insurer agreed to pay an additional Rs. 30,000 within two months. The matter was disposed of based on the compromise petition filed by both parties, with conditions imposed by the Claims Tribunal remaining intact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts