DEEPAK MINZ vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,ASHISH SURANA,JITENDRA SHRIVASTAVA — WPC/3930/2021
Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010252132021
Filing Number
WPC/13482/2021
Filing Date
22-Sep-2021
Registration No
WPC/3930/2021
Registration Date
23-Sep-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--INFRUCTUOUS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK MINZ
Adv. MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,Somraj Shrivastava,Somraj Shrivastava, ,SOURABH SAHU,ISHA JAJODIA,ISHA JAJODIA,Somraj Shrivastava
-
2.Firoz Ansari
-
3.Arvind Yadav
-
4.Dadhi Pal Sing
-
5.Jaipal Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,ASHISH SURANA,JITENDRA SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.The Secretary
-
3.Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited
Adv. Bharat Sharma
-
4.The Registrar
-
5.Collector
-
6.District Marketing Officer
-
7.District Cooperative Central Bank Limited
-
8.Nodal Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3930/2021 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition on May 8, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous (no longer capable of granting any effective relief). The respondents did not oppose this submission, and the court accordingly dismissed the petition along with any pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Oct-2021
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
-
29-Sep-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
29-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3930/2021
Case Summary: WPC/3930/2021 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition on May 8, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous (no longer capable of granting any effective relief). The respondents did not oppose this submission, and the court accordingly dismissed the petition along with any pending interlocutory applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts