VISHWANATH RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DR. SAURABH KUMAR PANDE — WPS/5602/2021
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010252092021
Filing Number
WPS/13478/2021
Filing Date
22-Sep-2021
Registration No
WPS/5602/2021
Registration Date
30-Sep-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWANATH RATRE
Adv. NASIMUDDIN ANSARI,N.K.CHATTERJEE,N.K.CHATTERJEE, ,D.K.VISHWAKARMA,N.K.CHATTERJEE
-
2.Firat Kumar
-
3.Satya Narayan Azad
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DR. SAURABH KUMAR PANDE
-
2.Principal Secretary,
-
3.Director,
-
4.Joint Director,
-
5.Collector,
-
6.Controller of Examination Board,
Adv. AVINASH SINGH,AKANKSHA SINGH
-
7.District Education Officer,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed WPS No. 5602 of 2021 as infructuous on 10/04/2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time, which was not opposed by the State, leading Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey to dismiss the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2023
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
12-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
20-Oct-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
20-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/5602/2021
The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed WPS No. 5602 of 2021 as infructuous on 10/04/2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time, which was not opposed by the State, leading Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey to dismiss the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts