SUNIL KUMAR JANGADE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4313/2024
Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010248442024
Filing Number
WPS/13952/2024
Filing Date
22-Jul-2024
Registration No
WPS/4313/2024
Registration Date
27-Jul-2024
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
ULTRA VIRES MATTERS ( 1749 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR JANGADE
Adv. RISHI RAHUL SONI,Laxmeen Kashyap,Laxmeen Kashyap, ,LEEKESH KUMAR,Laxmeen Kashyap
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Director General,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: In WPS No. 4313 of 2024, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Sunil Kumar Jangade's challenge regarding promotional avenues and pay scale benefits for drivers. The State was granted four weeks to file its reply (with a warning that no further extension would be granted), and the petitioner was given two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder. The case was listed for further hearing in July 2026 after the State sought instructions on the comparative promotional position of drivers in Madhya Pradesh versus Chhattisgarh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
31-Jul-2024
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
31-Jul-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
22-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/4313/2024
Summary: In WPS No. 4313 of 2024, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard petitioner Sunil Kumar Jangade's challenge regarding promotional avenues and pay scale benefits for drivers. The State was granted four weeks to file its reply (with a warning that no further extension would be granted), and the petitioner was given two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder. The case was listed for further hearing in July 2026 after the State sought instructions on the comparative promotional position of drivers in Madhya Pradesh versus Chhattisgarh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts