RUKMANI VAISHNAV vs NITESH PATEL — MAC/1476/2024
Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010247482024
Filing Number
MAC/13889/2024
Filing Date
19-Jul-2024
Registration No
MAC/1476/2024
Registration Date
23-Jul-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUKMANI VAISHNAV
Adv. ANAND KESHARWANI,S.D.SINGH,S.D.SINGH, ,Sumit Jhawar,VINEET KUMAR PANDEY,S.D.SINGH
-
2.Kumari Shruti Vaishnav
-
3.Santosh Das Vaishnav
-
4.Smt. Shyam Bai Vaishnav
Respondent(s)
-
1.NITESH PATEL
-
2.Bharat Axa General Insurance Company Limited
Adv. SHEKHAR RAO SAHEB AMIN,Shobhit Mishra SHRIJITA KESHARWANI AKANSHA VERMA DABHADKER
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
The case was adjourned to July 2026. The notice to respondent No. 1 (Nitesh Patel) was returned unserved as he was not found at the given address. The appellant's counsel was directed to file the correct and present address of respondent No. 1 on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For The Nation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
-
28-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
23-Oct-2024
Fresh Matters ( Dormant Case )
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
-
25-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
25-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1476/2024
The case was adjourned to July 2026. The notice to respondent No. 1 (Nitesh Patel) was returned unserved as he was not found at the given address. The appellant's counsel was directed to file the correct and present address of respondent No. 1 on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts