Bhanjan Ram vs State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G. — WPS/5561/2019
Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010246032019
Filing Number
WPS/14195/2019
Filing Date
23-Jul-2019
Registration No
WPS/5561/2019
Registration Date
25-Jul-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK. ( 612 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhanjan Ram
Adv. Baldau Prasad Banjare
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
-
3.District Education Officer
-
4.Block Education Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: Bhanjan Ram, a government school teacher in Jashpur district, sought direction to grant him regular pay scale upon completing three years of service. The Chhattisgarh High Court's National Lok Adalat disposed of the petition by accepting a compromise between both parties, wherein the State Education Department fulfilled the petitioner's demand. The court found the settlement terms just, proper, and lawful, and accordingly withdrew the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
30-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
30-Jul-2019
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
-
23-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/5561/2019
Case Summary: Bhanjan Ram, a government school teacher in Jashpur district, sought direction to grant him regular pay scale upon completing three years of service. The Chhattisgarh High Court's National Lok Adalat disposed of the petition by accepting a compromise between both parties, wherein the State Education Department fulfilled the petitioner's demand. The court found the settlement terms just, proper, and lawful, and accordingly withdrew the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts