SUDARSHAN BANJARE vs RAISEN MANHAR Advocate - Pradeep Kumar Jogi, ,Lavkush Kumar Sahu,VINOD KUMAR AJAY — MAC/1402/2019

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010243862019

Filing Number

MAC/14051/2019

Filing Date

22-Jul-2019

Registration No

MAC/1402/2019

Registration Date

30-Jul-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDARSHAN BANJARE

    Adv. ARJUN LAL SINGROUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAISEN MANHAR Advocate - Pradeep Kumar Jogi, ,Lavkush Kumar Sahu,VINOD KUMAR AJAY

  2. 2.Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited

    Adv. ,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA Sharad Mishra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the Insurance Company's appeal challenging compensation awarded in a motor accident case, finding no valid evidence of permit violation. Simultaneously, the Court allowed the claimant's enhancement appeal, increasing total compensation from ₹2,01,341 to ₹5,68,721 by including future prospects, 20% disability compensation, and additional heads like amenities and mental agony. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the additional amount of ₹3,67,380 within three months with 6% interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 01-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  5. 01-Aug-2019

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  6. 22-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1402/2019

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the Insurance Company's appeal challenging compensation awarded in a motor accident case, finding no valid evidence of permit violation. Simultaneously, the Court allowed the claimant's enhancement appeal, increasing total compensation from ₹2,01,341 to ₹5,68,721 by including future prospects, 20% disability compensation, and additional heads like amenities and mental agony. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the additional amount of ₹3,67,380 within three months with 6% interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case