SANTOSH BANJARE vs RAISEN MANHAR Advocate - Pradeep Kumar Jogi, ,VINOD KUMAR AJAY,Lavkush Kumar Sahu — MAC/1419/2019
Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010243842019
Filing Number
MAC/14049/2019
Filing Date
22-Jul-2019
Registration No
MAC/1419/2019
Registration Date
31-Jul-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH BANJARE
Adv. ARJUN LAL SINGROUL
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAISEN MANHAR Advocate - Pradeep Kumar Jogi, ,VINOD KUMAR AJAY,Lavkush Kumar Sahu
-
2.Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Companty Ltd
Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA Sharad Mishra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against liability for a motor accident claim, finding insufficient evidence that the vehicle lacked a valid permit. Simultaneously, the court allowed the claimant's appeal for enhanced compensation, increasing the award from ₹5,25,014 to ₹7,02,314 after finding the tribunal's assessment of injuries and future prospects inadequate, with the insurer directed to pay the additional ₹1,77,300 within three months plus 6% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
01-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
22-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1419/2019
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against liability for a motor accident claim, finding insufficient evidence that the vehicle lacked a valid permit. Simultaneously, the court allowed the claimant's appeal for enhanced compensation, increasing the award from ₹5,25,014 to ₹7,02,314 after finding the tribunal's assessment of injuries and future prospects inadequate, with the insurer directed to pay the additional ₹1,77,300 within three months plus 6% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts