HARISHANKAR DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Animesh Tiwari — WPS/5184/2022

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010241462022

Filing Number

WPS/13147/2022

Filing Date

21-Jul-2022

Registration No

WPS/5184/2022

Registration Date

27-Jul-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISHANKAR DEWANGAN

    Adv. P. Acharya,MANEE RAM YADAV,MANEE RAM YADAV, ,Animesh Tiwari,Animesh Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Animesh Tiwari

  2. 2.The Director Department Of Ayurvedic

  3. 3.Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board

  4. 4.Shri Kuldeep

    Adv. SHAILENDRA DUBEY,SHIVANG DUBEY Shivali Dubey Shubham Dev Mallick

  5. 5.Shri Dharmendra Kumar Verma

  6. 6.Shri Omkar Prasad Sahu

  7. 7.Shri Hemant Kumar Patel

  8. 8.Shri Rajendra Prasad Patel

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    In WPS No. 5184/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter on 16/04/2026. The court granted three weeks' time to the respondents' counsel to file their reply, and the case was called thereafter for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 02-Aug-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  5. 02-Aug-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  6. 21-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/5184/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In WPS No. 5184/2022, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur adjourned the matter on 16/04/2026. The court granted three weeks' time to the respondents' counsel to file their reply, and the case was called thereafter for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case