STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, vs MAJID @ RAJU KHAN, Advocate - Samir Singh, ,ARVIND PRASAD,ASHWELL FRANKLIN — ACQA/192/2021

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010234172021

Filing Number

ACQA/10869/2021

Filing Date

07-Sep-2021

Registration No

ACQA/192/2021

Registration Date

10-Sep-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL U/S 419 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1421 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAJID @ RAJU KHAN, Advocate - Samir Singh, ,ARVIND PRASAD,ASHWELL FRANKLIN

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

    In ACQA No. 192 of 2021 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in State of Chhattisgarh versus Majid @ Raju Khan, the matter was adjourned on 01/04/2026. The respondent did not appear despite being served, while the Deputy Government Advocate represented the State/appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  7. 01-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  8. 10-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  9. 10-Jun-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  10. 07-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/192/2021

casestatus.in Summary

In ACQA No. 192 of 2021 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in State of Chhattisgarh versus Majid @ Raju Khan, the matter was adjourned on 01/04/2026. The respondent did not appear despite being served, while the Deputy Government Advocate represented the State/appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case