SMT. KUMARI KAUSHIK vs DHARMENDRA GAYAKWAD — MAC/1164/2023
Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010232082023
Filing Number
MAC/13192/2023
Filing Date
17-Jul-2023
Registration No
MAC/1164/2023
Registration Date
19-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ACCIDENTS OTHER THAN THOSE COVERED BY M.V. ACT. ( 1208 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. KUMARI KAUSHIK
Adv. GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,NUPOOR SONKAR,NUPOOR SONKAR, ,Gaurav Singhal,Gaurav Singhal,Resham lal Jaiswal,NUPOOR SONKAR
-
2.Dev Kaushik,
-
3.Smt. Shukwara Kaushik,
-
4.Kanhaiya Lal Kaushik,
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRA GAYAKWAD
-
2.Chandrakant Tiwari,
Adv. KESHAV PRASAD GUPTA,VIVEK SINGHAL
-
3.United India Insurance Company Limited,
Adv. SUDHIR AGRAWAL,PRASANJEET DUTTA JYOTI AGRAWAL
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Summary: In MAC/1164/2023, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the case on 04.05.2026 with counsel present for the appellants and respondents 2 and 3, while respondent 1 remained absent despite service. The court adjourned the case and ordered it to be listed together with MAC/654/2023 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
10-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
20-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh ChandelView PDF
-
20-Jul-2023
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
-
17-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1164/2023
Summary: In MAC/1164/2023, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the case on 04.05.2026 with counsel present for the appellants and respondents 2 and 3, while respondent 1 remained absent despite service. The court adjourned the case and ordered it to be listed together with MAC/654/2023 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts