ANURAG SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1818/2023

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010229782023

Filing Number

CRMP/9943/2023

Filing Date

14-Jul-2023

Registration No

CRMP/1818/2023

Registration Date

10-Aug-2023

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANURAG SHARMA

    Adv. PRABHAKAR SINGH CHANDEL,CHANDRA KUMAR,CHANDRA KUMAR, ,SEEMA SINGH,SUSHOBHIT SINGH,CHANDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Anjor Das Koshle

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Anurag Sharma's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 173/2017 (filed March 26, 2017) for offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 120B and the Prize Chits Act/Depositors Protection Act. The court declined to entertain the petition as the charge-sheet had already been filed and trial was ongoing with prosecution evidence being recorded. Instead, the court disposed of the petition with a direction to expedite the trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 11-Aug-2023

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  5. 14-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1818/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Anurag Sharma's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 173/2017 (filed March 26, 2017) for offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 120B and the Prize Chits Act/Depositors Protection Act. The court declined to entertain the petition as the charge-sheet had already been filed and trial was ongoing with prosecution evidence being recorded. Instead, the court disposed of the petition with a direction to expedite the trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case