M/S BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha — WPT/186/2023
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010227952023
Filing Number
WPT/12917/2023
Filing Date
13-Jul-2023
Registration No
WPT/186/2023
Registration Date
17-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DIRECT TAXES MATTER ( 3 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 321 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD.
Adv. Gopal Swaroop Gupta,Aditya S. Gupta,Aditya S. Gupta, ,Tanuj Patwardhan,Aditya S. Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI, ,Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha
-
2.Pincipal Commissioner
Adv. Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha,Shruti Pramar SAURABH SHUKLA
-
3.Commissioner
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a stay of effect and operation of show-cause notices dated 06.05.2011 and 28.6.2023 issued to Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. under the Central Excise Act, 1942, finding that adjudicating a notice issued over a decade ago violates principles of reasonable adjudication timelines. The case has been listed for hearing after four weeks, with interim relief continuing until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2024
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
16-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
18-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
18-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WPT/186/2023
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted a stay of effect and operation of show-cause notices dated 06.05.2011 and 28.6.2023 issued to Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. under the Central Excise Act, 1942, finding that adjudicating a notice issued over a decade ago violates principles of reasonable adjudication timelines. The case has been listed for hearing after four weeks, with interim relief continuing until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts