SMT. PARAS DEVI RAMPURIYA vs SMT. PALAK LOHIA Advocate - ADITYA BHARDWAJ — WP227/582/2023

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010227732023

Filing Number

WP227/12901/2023

Filing Date

13-Jul-2023

Registration No

WP227/582/2023

Registration Date

20-Jul-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PARAS DEVI RAMPURIYA

    Adv. Shalvik Tiwari,Ashwin Panickar,Ashwin Panickar, ,Ashwin Panickar

  2. 2.Atul Rampuriya,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PALAK LOHIA Advocate - ADITYA BHARDWAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition WP227/582/2023 filed by Smt. Paras Devi Rampuriya and Atul Rampuriya against Smt. Palak Lohia on 05/05/2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that the parties intended to settle the dispute amicably and withdrew the petition. Accordingly, the court dismissed it as "not pressed." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 11-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 03-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 21-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  7. 21-Jul-2023

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  8. 13-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/582/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition WP227/582/2023 filed by Smt. Paras Devi Rampuriya and Atul Rampuriya against Smt. Palak Lohia on 05/05/2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that the parties intended to settle the dispute amicably and withdrew the petition. Accordingly, the court dismissed it as "not pressed." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case