YADAVRAM NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/5333/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010227132026

Filing Number

MCRC/9739/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

MCRC/5333/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YADAVRAM NISHAD

    Adv. PARAG KOTECHA,Bhavika Kotecha,Bhavika Kotecha, ,TANUSHA PATHAK,Bhavika Kotecha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/5333/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Yadavram Nishad, arrested for allegedly abetting his wife's suicide under Sections 108 & 85 of BNS. The wife died after consuming organophosphorus insecticide; witnesses testified he frequently beat and harassed her. The court allowed bail despite the state's opposition, considering the charge sheet was filed, no suicide note existed, prolonged detention since April 12, 2026, and trial duration uncertainty. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including courtroom attendance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/5333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/5333/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Yadavram Nishad, arrested for allegedly abetting his wife's suicide under Sections 108 & 85 of BNS. The wife died after consuming organophosphorus insecticide; witnesses testified he frequently beat and harassed her. The court allowed bail despite the state's opposition, considering the charge sheet was filed, no suicide note existed, prolonged detention since April 12, 2026, and trial duration uncertainty. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including courtroom attendance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case